The FX-8150 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-6500T. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the FX-8150
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Core i5-6500T
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
FX-8150 vs Core i5-6500T for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
167
93%
Min 1% FPS
112
94%
Price, CA$
CA$158.85
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.95/FPS
100%
Core i5-6500T
Jul 2nd, 2015
Average FPS
179
100%
Min 1% FPS
119
100%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
FX-8150 vs Core i5-6500T in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8150 vs Core i5-6500T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8150 vs Core i5-6500T in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-6500T
Jul 2nd, 2015
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
79%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-8150 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-6500T |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Skylake |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Performance | ||
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.1 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR3 @ 2133 MHz, DDR4 @ 2133 MHz |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
