Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 4102 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of FX-8150
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - CA$160.80 vs CA$270.73
- Up to 33% better value when playing Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i5-13400F - CA$0.78 vs CA$1.17 per FPS
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 13% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than FX-8150 - 232 vs 206 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 16 vs 8 threads
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
206
89%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.78/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$160.8
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$160.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 262 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
232
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.17/FPS
67%
Price, CA$
CA$270.73
59%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$270.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 262 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8150 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |