Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 4102 days newer than FX-8120.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 20% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than FX-8120 - 248 vs 206 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 120 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
248
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$743.19
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$743.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7386 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8120 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |