Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 4500 outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 4500 is 3827 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of FX-8120
- Up to 20% cheaper than Ryzen 5 4500 - CA$87.02 vs CA$109.00
- Up to 11% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen 5 4500 - CA$0.79 vs CA$0.89 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 5 4500
- Performs up to 12% better in Elden Ring than FX-8120 - 123 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 12 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
110
89%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.79/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 207 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
123
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.89/FPS
89%
Price, CA$
CA$109
79%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$109 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8120 | vs | Ryzen 5 4500 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Not Available |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |