Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3193 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 23% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-6350 - 145 vs 118 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 58 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 8 vs 6 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
145
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.75/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$109
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$109 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7697 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-6350 | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 58 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |