Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7700 outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 7700 is 3735 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of FX-6300
- Up to 56% cheaper than Ryzen 7 7700 - CA$191.81 vs CA$438.98
- Up to 47% better value when playing God of War than Ryzen 7 7700 - CA$1.18 vs CA$2.23 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 7 7700
- Performs up to 21% better in God of War than FX-6300 - 197 vs 163 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
163
83%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.18/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$191.81
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$191.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
197
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.23/FPS
53%
Price, CA$
CA$438.98
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$438.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-6300 | vs | Ryzen 7 7700 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Vishera | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |