In Battlefield 6, the FX-6300 is much slower than the Ryzen 7 5800X3D. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-6300
- Consumes up to 10% less energy – 95 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 10% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
- Up to 108% faster in Battlefield 6 – 127 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 108% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 9 years and 5 months newer – Apr 20, 2022 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 9 years and 5 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
FX-6300 vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D: Comparison of performance and price
FX-6300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
61 FPS
48%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
48%
Price, $
$40.65
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6300 vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6300 vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
8 MB
8%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
91%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
58%
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Apr 20th, 2022
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
96 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-6300 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 5800X3D Apr 20th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Released | Apr 20th, 2022 |
$132.00 | MSRP | $449.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | AM4 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 105 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
