The FX-6200 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-9600K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the FX-6200
The Core i5-9600K is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i5-9600K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
FX-6200 vs Core i5-9600K for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
FX-6200
Feb 27th, 2012
Average FPS
166
86%
Min 1% FPS
112
88%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i5-9600K
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
192
100%
Min 1% FPS
127
100%
Price, CA$
CA$215
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.11/FPS
100%
FX-6200 vs Core i5-9600K in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6200 vs Core i5-9600K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6200 vs Core i5-9600K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6200
Feb 27th, 2012
Cores
3-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
89%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
89%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-9600K
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-6200 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-9600K |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Zambezi | Codename | Coffee Lake |
125 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
Performance | ||
3 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 9 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |