In Battlefield 6, the FX-4350 is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 9 5950X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-4350
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 9 5950X
- Up to 69% faster in Battlefield 6 – 103 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 69% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 7 years and 6 months newer – Nov 05, 2020 vs Apr 29, 2013
- Is 7 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 16% less energy – 105 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 16% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
FX-4350 vs Ryzen 9 5950X: Comparison of performance and price
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Average FPS
61 FPS
59%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
60%
Price, $
$82.71
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.35/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4350 vs Ryzen 9 5950X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4350 vs Ryzen 9 5950X in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
8 MB
12%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
88%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
58%
Ryzen 9 5950X
Nov 5th, 2020
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-4350 Apr 29th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 5950X Nov 5th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Released | Nov 5th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | $799.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | AM4 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 105 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
