Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 3111 days newer than the cheaper FX-4350.
Advantages of FX-4350
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - CA$120.26 vs CA$398.45
- Up to 64% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i9-12900KF - CA$0.44 vs CA$1.23 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 18% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than FX-4350 - 324 vs 274 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 24 vs 4 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
274
85%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$120.26
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$120.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
324
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.23/FPS
36%
Price, CA$
CA$398.45
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$398.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-4350 | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |