The FX-4300 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-10105F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the FX-4300
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i3-10105F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
FX-4300 vs Core i3-10105F
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
181
89%
Min 1% FPS
126
90%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
204
100%
Min 1% FPS
140
100%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4300 vs Core i3-10105F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4300 vs Core i3-10105F in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
91%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
70%
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-4300 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-10105F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| $122.00 | MSRP | $97.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
| Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake-R |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.4 GHz |
| 4 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
