The FX-4100 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 3 3200G. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the FX-4100
The Ryzen 3 3200G is better in every way
Advantages of the Ryzen 3 3200G
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
FX-4100 vs Ryzen 3 3200G for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
FX-4100
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
166
93%
Min 1% FPS
112
94%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
179
100%
Min 1% FPS
119
100%
Price, CA$
CA$127.24
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.71/FPS
100%
FX-4100 vs Ryzen 3 3200G in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4100 vs Ryzen 3 3200G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4100 vs Ryzen 3 3200G in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4100
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
92%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-4100 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 3 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| $115.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Picasso |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR4 |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
