In Battlefield 6, the FX-4100 is quite a bit slower than the Core i7-13700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-4100
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-13700F
- Up to 98% faster in Battlefield 6 – 121 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 98% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 11 years and 2 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Oct 12, 2011
- Is 11 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
FX-4100 vs Core i7-13700F: Comparison of performance and price
FX-4100
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
61 FPS
50%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
51%
Price, $
$105.36
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.72/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4100 vs Core i7-13700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4100 vs Core i7-13700F in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4100
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
73%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
33%
Core i7-13700F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
58%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-4100 Oct 12th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-13700F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
$115.00 | MSRP | $359.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
