Key Differences
In short — EPYC 9654 outperforms Core i7-12700KF on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 9654 is 371 days newer than Core i7-12700KF.
Advantages of EPYC 9654
- Performs up to 4% better in World of Warcraft than Core i7-12700KF - 229 vs 220 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-12700KF - 192 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Core i7-12700KF
- Consumes up to 65% less energy than AMD EPYC 9654 - 125 vs 360 Watts
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
220
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.13/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$249
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$249 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 394 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Nov 10th, 2022
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 9654 | vs | Core i7-12700KF |
---|---|---|
Nov 10th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i7 |
Not Available | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
96 | Cores | 12 |
192 | Threads | 20 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
360 W | TDP | 125 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |