Key Differences
In short — EPYC 9554 outperforms Core i9-12900KF on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 9554 is 371 days newer than Core i9-12900KF.
Advantages of EPYC 9554
- Performs up to 0% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-12900KF - 213 vs 212 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 128 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Consumes up to 65% less energy than AMD EPYC 9554 - 125 vs 360 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
212
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.89/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$401.64
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$401.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 356 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Nov 10th, 2022
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 9554 | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Nov 10th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Not Available | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 16 |
128 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
360 W | TDP | 125 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |