The EPYC 9454P is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-8350. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the EPYC 9454P
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 96 vs 8 threads
Advantages of the FX-8350
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 125 vs 290 Watts
- Has an integrated GPU, while the EPYC 9454P cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
EPYC 9454P vs FX-8350 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
EPYC 9454P
Nov 10th, 2022
Average FPS
198
100%
Min 1% FPS
131
100%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
FX-8350
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
168
85%
Min 1% FPS
113
86%
Price, CA$
CA$333.16
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.98/FPS
100%
EPYC 9454P vs FX-8350 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 9454P vs FX-8350 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 9454P vs FX-8350 in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 9454P
Nov 10th, 2022
Cores
48-core
100%
L3 Cache
256 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.75 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
90%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
FX-8350
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
17%
L3 Cache
8 MB
3%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
39%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 9454P | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Nov 10th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
$4,598.00 | MSRP | $199.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket SP5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Not Available | Codename | Vishera |
290 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
Performance | ||
48 | Cores | 8 |
96 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 GHz |
256 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR5 @ 4800 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |