The EPYC 9354 is a faster gaming CPU than the Core i5-10400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the EPYC 9354
- A faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 64 vs 12 threads
Advantages of the Core i5-10400F
- Consumes up to 77% less energy – 65 vs 280 Watts
EPYC 9354 vs Core i5-10400F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
EPYC 9354
Nov 10th, 2022
Average FPS
194
100%
Min 1% FPS
128
100%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
187
96%
Min 1% FPS
124
97%
Price, CA$
CA$169.95
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.9/FPS
100%
EPYC 9354 vs Core i5-10400F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 9354 vs Core i5-10400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 9354 vs Core i5-10400F in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 9354
Nov 10th, 2022
Cores
32-core
100%
L3 Cache
256 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.25 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
88%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
19%
L3 Cache
12 MB
5%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
56%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 9354 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Nov 10th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
$3,420.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket SP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Not Available | Codename | Comet Lake |
280 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
32 | Cores | 6 |
64 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.3 GHz |
256 MB | L3 Cache | 12 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR5 @ 4800 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | No |
No | Overclockable | No |