Key Differences
In short — EPYC 9174F outperforms Ryzen 7 5700X3D on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 9174F is 424 days older than Ryzen 7 5700X3D.
Advantages of EPYC 9174F
- Performs up to 11% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 7 5700X3D - 219 vs 197 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700X3D
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD EPYC 9174F - 105 vs 320 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
197
90%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.77/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$349
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$349 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7251 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Nov 10th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 9174F | vs | Ryzen 7 5700X3D |
---|---|---|
Nov 10th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Not Available | Codename | Not Available |
AMD Socket SP5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
320 W | TDP | 105 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |