Key Differences
In short — EPYC 9174F outperforms Core i3-12100F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 9174F is 289 days newer than Core i3-12100F.
Advantages of EPYC 9174F
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than AMD EPYC 9174F - 58 vs 320 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
286
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$109
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$109 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7242 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Nov 10th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 9174F | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Nov 10th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i3 |
Not Available | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
320 W | TDP | 58 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |