The EPYC 7F52 is a faster gaming CPU than the Ryzen 5 2600. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the EPYC 7F52
- A faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of the Ryzen 5 2600
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 65 vs 240 Watts
EPYC 7F52 vs Ryzen 5 2600 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
EPYC 7F52
Apr 14th, 2020
Average FPS
186
100%
Min 1% FPS
123
100%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Ryzen 5 2600
Apr 19th, 2018
Average FPS
181
97%
Min 1% FPS
120
98%
Price, CA$
CA$88.39
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.48/FPS
100%
EPYC 7F52 vs Ryzen 5 2600 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 7F52 vs Ryzen 5 2600 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 7F52 vs Ryzen 5 2600 in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 7F52
Apr 14th, 2020
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
256 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Ryzen 5 2600
Apr 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
38%
L3 Cache
16 MB
6%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
92%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 7F52 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 5 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $199.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Not Available | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| 240 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
256 MB | L3 Cache | 16 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2933 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
