Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms EPYC 7713 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 660 days newer than EPYC 7713.
Advantages of EPYC 7713
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 128 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 6% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than EPYC 7713 - 125 vs 118 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
125
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.17/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$271.2
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$271.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7335 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 15th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 7713 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 15th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
Not Available | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 10 |
128 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
225 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |