Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700K outperforms EPYC 7642 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-14700K is 1532 days newer than EPYC 7642.
Advantages of EPYC 7642
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-14700K - 96 vs 28 threads
Advantages of Core i7-14700K
- Performs up to 11% better in Monster Hunter: World than EPYC 7642 - 284 vs 255 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7642 doesn't have integrated graphics
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
EPYC 7642
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i7-14700K
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 7642 | vs | Core i7-14700K |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i7 |
| Not Available | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
48 | Cores | 20 |
96 | Threads | 28 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 225 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
