Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7700X outperforms EPYC 75F3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 7700X is 561 days newer than EPYC 75F3.
Advantages of EPYC 75F3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 7700X - 64 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 7 7700X
- Performs up to 28% better in Starfield than EPYC 75F3 - 83 vs 65 FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD EPYC 75F3 - 105 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 75F3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
83
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.29/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$439
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$439 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7187 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 15th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 75F3 | vs | Ryzen 7 7700X |
---|---|---|
Mar 15th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Not Available | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 8 |
64 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 105 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
29.5x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |