The EPYC 7401P is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-14900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the EPYC 7401P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 48 vs 32 threads
Advantages of the Core i9-14900F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
EPYC 7401P vs Core i9-14900F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
EPYC 7401P
Jun 29th, 2017
Average FPS
173
79%
Min 1% FPS
116
81%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
218
100%
Min 1% FPS
143
100%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
EPYC 7401P vs Core i9-14900F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 7401P vs Core i9-14900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 7401P vs Core i9-14900F in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 7401P
Jun 29th, 2017
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
52%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
56%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 7401P | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Not Available | MSRP | $524.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Naples | Codename | Raptor Lake |
170 W | Power Consumption | Not Available |
Performance | ||
24 | Cores | 24 |
48 | Threads | 32 |
2.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.0 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.8 GHz |
64 MB | L3 Cache | 36 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |