The EPYC 7313P is a slightly slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-10900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the EPYC 7313P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 20 threads
Advantages of the Core i9-10900KF
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 19% less energy – 125 vs 155 Watts
EPYC 7313P vs Core i9-10900KF for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
EPYC 7313P
Mar 15th, 2021
Average FPS
189
98%
Min 1% FPS
125
98%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Core i9-10900KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
193
100%
Min 1% FPS
128
100%
Price, CA$
CA$400
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.07/FPS
100%
EPYC 7313P vs Core i9-10900KF in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 7313P vs Core i9-10900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 7313P vs Core i9-10900KF in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 7313P
Mar 15th, 2021
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
70%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i9-10900KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
62%
L3 Cache
20 MB
16%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
92%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 7313P | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-10900KF |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 15th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $913.00 | MSRP | $509.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
| Not Available | Codename | Comet Lake |
| 155 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
16 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.3 GHz |
128 MB | L3 Cache | 20 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2933 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
