Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms EPYC 7302 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 73 days newer than EPYC 7302.
Advantages of EPYC 7302
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 155 vs 165 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900X - 32 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 4% better in Forza Horizon 5 than EPYC 7302 - 167 vs 160 FPS
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
167
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.28/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$881.82
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$881.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 7302 | vs | Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Not Available | Codename | Cascade Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
155 W | TDP | 165 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |