Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms EPYC 7302 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 1147 days newer than EPYC 7302.
Advantages of EPYC 7302
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-13700K - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 52% better in Starfield than EPYC 7302 - 82 vs 54 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302 - 125 vs 155 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7302 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7302
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i7-13700K
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 7302 | vs | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i7 |
| Not Available | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 16 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
| 155 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
