Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Core M-5Y51 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 2991 days newer than Core M-5Y51.
Advantages of Core M-5Y51
- Consumes up to 97% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 4 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 21% better in Escape From Tarkov than Core M-5Y51 - 235 vs 194 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core M-5Y51 - 32 vs 4 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
235
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.68/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1099.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$1,099.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Oct 27th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core M-5Y51 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Oct 27th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core M | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Raphael |
Intel BGA 1234 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
4 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD 5300 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |