Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Core M-5Y10c on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 1714 days newer than Core M-5Y10c.
Advantages of Core M-5Y10c
- Consumes up to 94% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 4 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 56% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core M-5Y10c - 399 vs 255 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core M-5Y10c - 16 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
399
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.53/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$211.26
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$211.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 285 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Oct 27th, 2014
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core M-5Y10c | vs | Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Oct 27th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core M | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Broadwell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel BGA 1234 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
0.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
4 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
8.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 5300 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |