Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms Core M-5Y10c on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 2012 days newer than Core M-5Y10c.
Advantages of Core M-5Y10c
- Consumes up to 94% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900 - 4 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 12% better in Escape From Tarkov than Core M-5Y10c - 209 vs 186 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core M-5Y10c - 20 vs 4 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core M-5Y10c
Mobile • Oct 27th, 2014
Core i9-10900
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core M-5Y10c | vs | Core i9-10900 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 27th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core M | Collection | Core i9 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel BGA 1234 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
| 0.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
4 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 8.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD 5300 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
