Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Core i9-9940X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 634 days newer than Core i9-9940X.
Advantages of Core i9-9940X
- Consumes up to 41% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 165 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 1% better in Rocket League than Core i9-9940X - 729 vs 719 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9940X - 64 vs 28 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
729
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.36/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$3175
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$3,175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 384 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-9940X | vs | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 32 |
28 | Threads | 64 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |