Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i9-9920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-9920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 1538 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-9920X.
Advantages of Core i9-9920X
- Up to 48% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - CA$570.00 vs CA$1099.99
- Up to 37% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - CA$3.26 vs CA$5.19 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 21% better in No Man's Sky than Core i9-9920X - 212 vs 175 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 120 vs 165 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9920X - 32 vs 24 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9920X doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
175
83%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.26/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$570
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$570 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 163 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
212
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.19/FPS
63%
Price, CA$
CA$1099.99
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,099.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 162 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-9920X | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |