Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the more expensive Core i9-9920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 81 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-9920X.
Advantages of Core i9-9920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 6% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-9920X - 594 vs 559 FPS
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i9-9920X - CA$435.00 vs CA$529.99
- Up to 23% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-9920X - CA$0.73 vs CA$0.95 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 95 vs 165 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$529.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 285 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
594
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.73/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$435
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$435 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 285 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-9920X | vs | Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |