Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-9920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100F is 1194 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-9920X.
Advantages of Core i9-9920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 4% better in F1 22 than Core i9-9920X - 286 vs 275 FPS
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i9-9920X - CA$109.00 vs CA$529.99
- Up to 80% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i9-9920X - CA$0.38 vs CA$1.93 per FPS
- Consumes up to 65% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 58 vs 165 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for CA$529.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
286
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$109
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$109 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 203 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-9920X | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 58 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |