In Battlefield 6, the Core i9-9900T is slightly slower than the Core i7-10700KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-9900T
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-10700KF
- Up to 10% faster in Battlefield 6 – 88 vs 80 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 1 year and 7 days newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Apr 23, 2019
- Is 1 year and 7 days newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900T vs Core i7-10700KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900T vs Core i7-10700KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900T vs Core i7-10700KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
55%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
86%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
91%
Core i7-10700KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900T Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700KF Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $423.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
