In Battlefield 6, the Core i9-9900KF is slightly slower than the Core i9-10850K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-9900KF
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
Core i9-10850K
- Up to 3% faster in Battlefield 6 – 89 vs 86 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 1 year and 6 months newer – Jul 27, 2020 vs Jan 08, 2019
- Is 1 year and 6 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900KF vs Core i9-10850K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
86 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
64 FPS
96%
Price, $
$399
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.63/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900KF vs Core i9-10850K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900KF vs Core i9-10850K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
8-core
80%
L3 Cache
16 MB
80%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
96%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
91%
Core i9-10850K
Jul 27th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900KF Jan 8th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10850K Jul 27th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 8th, 2019 | Released | Jul 27th, 2020 |
| $488.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1200 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
