The Core i9-7920X is a slightly slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-10105F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i9-7920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of the Core i3-10105F
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 54% less energy – 65 vs 140 Watts
Core i9-7920X vs Core i3-10105F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-7920X
Sep 10th, 2017
Average FPS
185
99%
Min 1% FPS
123
99%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
187
100%
Min 1% FPS
124
100%
Price, CA$
CA$96.58
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.51/FPS
100%
Core i9-7920X vs Core i3-10105F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-7920X vs Core i3-10105F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-7920X vs Core i3-10105F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-7920X
Sep 10th, 2017
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
16.5 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
98%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
6 MB
36%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i9-7920X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Sep 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
$1,199.00 | MSRP | $97.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
140 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.4 GHz |
16.5 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |