Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 1265 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 18% better in Battlefield IV than Core i7-10700F - 499 vs 424 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Core i7-10700F
- Up to 37% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - CA$435.52 vs CA$696.59
- Up to 26% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i9-14900KF - CA$1.03 vs CA$1.40 per FPS
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
499
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.4/FPS
74%
Price, CA$
CA$696.59
62%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$696.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
424
85%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.03/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$435.52
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$435.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 115 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900KF | vs | Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |