Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 1265 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10100.
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 16% better in God of War than Core i3-10100 - 202 vs 174 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10100 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i3-10100
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - CA$130.99 vs CA$716.28
- Up to 79% better value when playing God of War than Core i9-14900KF - CA$0.75 vs CA$3.55 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
202
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.55/FPS
21%
Price, CA$
CA$716.28
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$716.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1444 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
174
86%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.75/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$130.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$130.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1170 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900KF | vs | Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |