Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Ryzen 5 3600 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 1285 days newer than Ryzen 5 3600.
Advantages of Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 27% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Ryzen 5 3600 - 285 vs 224 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
224
79%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.75/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$167.61
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$167.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7321 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-13900KS | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |