The Core i9-13900KS is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-8320. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i9-13900KS
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of the FX-8320
- Consumes up to 17% less energy – 125 vs 150 Watts
Core i9-13900KS vs FX-8320 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-13900KS
Jan 12th, 2023
Average FPS
224
100%
Min 1% FPS
147
100%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
167
75%
Min 1% FPS
112
76%
Price, CA$
CA$64.51
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.38/FPS
100%
Core i9-13900KS vs FX-8320 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900KS vs FX-8320 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900KS vs FX-8320 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900KS
Jan 12th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
62%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i9-13900KS | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
$699.00 | MSRP | $169.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
150 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
Performance | ||
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
36 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |