Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i9-11900KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-11900KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 560 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-11900KF.
Advantages of Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 7% better in Battlefield IV than Core i9-11900KF - 492 vs 459 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Core i9-11900KF
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - CA$508.73 vs CA$629.99
- Up to 13% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i9-13900KF - CA$1.11 vs CA$1.28 per FPS
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
492
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.28/FPS
87%
Price, CA$
CA$629.99
80%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$629.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
459
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.11/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$508.73
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$508.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-13900KF | vs | Core i9-11900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |