Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-14400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-14400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 468 days older than the cheaper Core i5-14400F.
Advantages of Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 1% better in Dishonored 2 than Core i5-14400F - 276 vs 273 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-14400F - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Core i5-14400F
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - CA$229.00 vs CA$629.99
- Up to 63% better value when playing Dishonored 2 than Core i9-13900KF - CA$0.84 vs CA$2.28 per FPS
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
276
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.28/FPS
37%
Price, CA$
CA$629.99
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$629.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
273
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.84/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$229
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$229 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-13900KF | vs | Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |