Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-13400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-13400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 99 days older than the cheaper Core i5-13400F.
Advantages of Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 6% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i5-13400F - 285 vs 270 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - CA$279.98 vs CA$629.99
- Up to 53% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i9-13900KF - CA$1.04 vs CA$2.21 per FPS
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
285
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.21/FPS
47%
Price, CA$
CA$629.99
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$629.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 270 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
270
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.04/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$279.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$279.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 270 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-13900KF | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |