Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the more expensive Core i9-9900KF on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 1031 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-9900KF.
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 10% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-9900KF - 212 vs 193 FPS
- Up to 8% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - CA$401.64 vs CA$435.00
- Up to 16% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-9900KF - CA$1.89 vs CA$2.25 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Core i9-9900KF
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
212
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.89/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$401.64
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$401.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
Buy for CA$435 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-12900KF | vs | Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |