In Battlefield 6, the Core i9-12900KF is faster than the Core i5-11600. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-12900KF
- Up to 23% faster in Battlefield 6 – 119 vs 97 FPS
- Up to 23% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 7 months and 19 days newer – Nov 04, 2021 vs Mar 16, 2021
- Is 7 months and 19 days newer
Core i5-11600
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i9-12900KF vs Core i5-11600: Comparison of performance and price
![Intel Core i9 [12th Gen] i9-12900KF Hexadeca-core [16 Core] 3.20 GHz Processor - OEM Pack](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/cpus/B09LMQ7XGX.jpg)
Core i5-11600
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
97 FPS
82%
Min 1% FPS
72 FPS
81%
Price, $
$140
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.44/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-12900KF vs Core i5-11600 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-12900KF vs Core i5-11600 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-12900KF
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Core i5-11600
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
38%
L3 Cache
12 MB
40%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
92%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
67%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-12900KF Nov 4th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-11600 Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Nov 4th, 2021 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| $564.00 | MSRP | $213.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
