Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 294 days older than the cheaper Core i5-12400F.
Advantages of Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield V than Core i5-12400F - 270 vs 266 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Core i5-12400F
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - CA$352.99 vs CA$507.86
- Up to 29% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i9-11900KF - CA$1.33 vs CA$1.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
270
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.88/FPS
71%
Price, CA$
CA$507.86
69%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$507.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 182 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
266
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.33/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$352.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$352.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 182 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-11900KF | vs | Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |