Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF and the cheaper Core i5-11400F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 1% better in F1 22 than Core i5-11400F - 287 vs 284 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Core i5-11400F
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - CA$237.23 vs CA$515.46
- Up to 53% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i9-11900KF - CA$0.84 vs CA$1.80 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
287
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.8/FPS
47%
Price, CA$
CA$515.46
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$515.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 525 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
284
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.84/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$237.23
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$237.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 525 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-11900KF | vs | Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |