Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10100.
Advantages of Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-10100 - 459 vs 416 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10100 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i3-10100
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - CA$130.99 vs CA$508.63
- Up to 72% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i9-11900KF - CA$0.31 vs CA$1.11 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
459
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.11/FPS
28%
Price, CA$
CA$508.63
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$508.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
416
91%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$130.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$130.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-11900KF | vs | Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |