Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-11900K outperforms the more expensive Core i9-13900F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-11900K is 659 days older than the more expensive Core i9-13900F.
Advantages of Core i9-11900K
- Up to 9% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - CA$514.97 vs CA$564.18
- Up to 9% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i9-13900F - CA$2.15 vs CA$2.35 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-13900F
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900K - 32 vs 16 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
240
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.15/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$514.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$514.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 407 minutes ago
Buy for CA$564.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 406 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-11900K | vs | Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |